4.7 Article

Short-term outcome of fertility-sparing laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis performed in a tertiary referral center

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 39-45

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.051

关键词

Laparoscopy; excision; endometriosis; deeply infiltrating; complications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the short-term surgical outcomes in women undergoing fertility-sparing laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary referral center for treatment of endometriosis, a university teaching hospital, London, United Kingdom. Patient(s): A total of 177 women who underwent fertility-sparing laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating endometriosis between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007. Intervention(s): Eligible women were identified from the surgeons' database, and their medical notes were reviewed. Data from preoperative assessment, surgery, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Main Outcome Measure(s): Complication rate. Result(s): One hundred seventy-seven women underwent fertility-sparing laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating endometriosis including excision of uterosacral ligaments (43, 24.3%), excision of rectovaginal septum (56, 31.6%), rectal shave (56, 31.6%), disk excision (7, 4%) or bowel resection (15, 8.5%). The median operative time was 95 minutes with a range of 30 to 270 minutes (interquartile range 75-120 minutes). Overall, complications developed in 18 women (10.2%). In 12 (6.8%) of these only uncomplicated pyrexia developed whereas significant intraoperative and/or postoperative complications developed in the remaining 6 (3.4%). Women spent C, a median of 2 days recovering in hospital (range 1-7, interquartile range 2-3 days). Conclusion(s): Fertility-sparing laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating endometriosis appears to be safe with a low short-term complication rate. (Fertil Steril(R) 2010;93:39-45. (C)2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据