4.7 Article

Evaluation of endometrial activin A secretion for prediction of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 93, 期 7, 页码 2316-2320

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.125

关键词

Endometrium; endometrial thickness; implantation; pregnancy; unexplained infertility; sonohysterography; sensitivity; specificity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To measure activin A concentrations in uterine washing fluid collected from women with couple infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI). Design: Retrospective case-control study. Setting: Tertiary university center for women's care. Patient(s): Fifty women, of whom 25 became pregnant after up to three IUI attempts and 25 did not. Intervention(s): Endocrine and clinical evaluation, semen analyses and hypo-osmotic swelling test, ovarian stimulation, endometrial thickness measurement by ultrasound, uterine washing fluid collection by sonohysterography, and IUI. Main Outcome Measure(s): Activin A measurement by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, and pregnancy rates after IUI; sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of activin A, and endometrial thickness for pregnancy prediction. Result(s): Activin A was measurable in all samples evaluated, and the levels (mean +/- SEM) were statistically significantly higher in the pregnant (0.08 +/- 0.01 ng/mL) than in the nonpregnant (0.022 +/- 0.001 ng/mL) group. Activin A at the cut off of 0.04 ng/mL achieved a sensitivity of 76.0 % (95% CI, 54.9% -90.6%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 86.2% -100%) as a single marker for prediction of pregnancy. Conclusion(s): Activin A is secreted into uterine lumen; the levels in endometrial washing fluids were higher in women who subsequently became pregnant after IUI, so its measurement may be useful in predicting successful implantation. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; (3: 2316-20. (C)2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据