4.7 Article

Effect of smoking on blood lead levels in workers and role of reactive oxygen species in lead-induced sperm chromatin DNA damage

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 91, 期 4, 页码 1096-1103

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.005

关键词

Lead exposure; smoking; blood lead levels; sperm chromatin DNA

资金

  1. National Science Council [NSC 94-2314-B-327-001]
  2. Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) of Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate whether cigarette smoking affects the blood lead levels (BLL) and whether exposure to lead introduces sperm chromatin DNA damage in factory workers. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: A battery plant in Taiwan. Patient(s): Eighty male workers employed within a battery plant. Intervention(s): Standard semen analysis was performed according to the World Health Organization guidelines. Main Outcome Measure(s): Assessment of BLL, sperm chromatin DNA structure, reactive oxygen species generation and other conventional parameters of semen quality. Result(s): As compared with nonsmoking workers, the BLL were found to be considerably higher among smokers. Statistically significant differences were found in the sperm DNA denaturation (alpha T) induction and the percentage of sperm with increased DNA denaturation (COMP alpha T) in workers with moderate BILL (>= 25 mu g/dL). After adjustment for smoking propensity, a positive correlation was discernible between BLL and alpha T, COMP alpha T, and morphologic abnormality. Furthermore, alpha T and COMP alpha T were also found to have positive correlations with sperm superoxide anion production. Conclusion(s): Workers with higher BLL were found to be at a higher risk of sperm morphologic abnormality and chromatin DNA integrity. These data are significant because they can facilitate the estimation of lead exposure in reproductive toxicology. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;91:1096-103. (C) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据