4.7 Article

Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 91, 期 2, 页码 632-638

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.068

关键词

Apoptosis; density-gradient centrifugation; flow cytometry; fluorospheres; semen analysis; sperm; swim-up; Syto 16

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare the effects of density-gradient centrifugation and swim-up on sperm apoptosis by using a multiparameter flow cytometric method. Design: Autocontrolled split-sample study. Setting: Tertiary infertility center. Patient(s): Sixty-two male partners of couples undergoing infertility investigations. Intervention(S): Each sample was analyzed both before and after semen preparation by optical microscopy and by flow cytometry. Main Outcome Measure(s): Percentage of viable, apoptotic, and necrotic sperm and recovery rate of total motile, progressive motile, and viable sperm before and after the two sperm preparation methods. Result(s): Compared with the original semen, the mean percentages of apoptotic and necrotic sperm were significantly lower after both sperm preparation methods. The mean percentage of viable sperm was significantly higher after swim-up compared with gradient centrifugation. The recovery rates of total motile. progressive motile, and viable sperm were significantly her using gradient centrifugation compared with swim-up. The viable sperm percentage and the progressive sperm motility were significant predictors for negative difference between the two methods in terms of viable sperm percentage after preparation. Conclusion(S): Both sperm preparation methods allow obtaining a sperm population with a low percentage of apoptotic sperm. Therefore, the risk of using apoptotic sperm for clinical treatment seems to be rather low. The choice of method will depend on whether IVF/ICSI or intrauterine insemination is to be performed. (Fertil Steril(R) 2009;91:632-8. (C)2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据