4.7 Article

Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 2437-2444

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.057

关键词

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; flare-up protocol; GnRH agonist; GnRH antagonist; poor responder; recombinant FSH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare the efficacy of microdose GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) flare-up and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocols in patients who have a poor response to a long luteal GnRH-a protocol. Design: Prospective, randomized, clinical study. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Forty-two poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-embryo transfer cycle. Intervention(s): Twenty-one patients received microdose leuprolide acetate (LA) (50 mu g twice daily) starting on the second day of withdrawal bleeding. The other 21 patients received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix daily when the leading follicle reached 14 mm in diameter. Main Outcome Measure(s): Serum E-2 levels, number of growing follicles and mature oocytes, embryo quality, dose of gonadotropin used, cancellation, fertilization, implantation rate and pregnancy rate (PR). Result(s): The mean serum E-2 concentration on the day of hCG administration was significantly higher in the microdose GnRH-a group than in the GnRH antagonist group (1,904 vs. 1,362 pg/mL). The clinical PRs per started cycle of microdose GnRH-a and GnRH antagonist groups were 14.2% and 9.5%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the other ovulation induction characteristics, fertilization and implantation rates. Conclusion(s): Microdose GnRH-a flare-up protocol and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol seem to have similar efficacy in improving treatment outcomes of poor responder patients. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;91:2437-44. (C) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据