4.7 Article

Protective effects of amlodipine on ischemia-reperfusion injury of rat ovary: biochemical and histopathologic evaluation

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 90, 期 6, 页码 2408-2415

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.007

关键词

Amlodipine; neutrophil; nitric oxide; ovarian; rat; reperfusion; torsion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the effects of amlodipine as an antioxidant and analyze the histopathologic changes in experimental ischemic and ischemic-reperfusion (I/R) injury in rat ovaries. Design: Experimental study. Setting: Experimental surgery laboratory. Animal(s): Forty-two rats with experimentally induced ovarian torsion. Intervention(s): Group 1: sham operation; group 2: bilateral ovarian ischemia; group 3: 3-hour period of ischemia plus 3 hours of reperfusion; groups 4 and 5: amlodipine administration at 3 and 5 mg/kg respectively before one half hour of ischemia, and then bilateral ovarian ischemia. The ovaries were removed at the third hour of ischemia. Groups 6 and 7: 3-hour period of bilateral ovarian ischemia. Two and a half hours after the induction of ischemia, the rats received amlodipine. At the end of a 3-hour period of ischemia, 3 hours of reperfusion was continued; then the ovaries were removed. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ovarian tissue superoxide dismutase and nitric oxide activity; histopathologic examination of all ovarian rat tissue. Result(s): Ischemia and I/R increased the inducible nitric oxide synthase activity while decreasing the superoxide dismutase activity significantly in comparison with the sham group. Both doses of amlodipine before ischemia and I/R reversed the trend in nitric oxide synthase activities and reversed the trend in the rat's ovary. Conclusion(s): Conservative treatment with amlodipine is effective in reducing tissue damage induced by ischemia, I/R, or both in ovaries. (Fertil Steril (R) 2008;90:2408-15. (C) 2008 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据