4.8 Article

Highly Stretchable Conductive Fibers from Few-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Coated on Poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) Polymer Core/Shell Structures

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 10252-10257

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04185

关键词

stretchable conductor; few-walled carbon nanotube; PMIA; core/shell structure; fibers; stretching-induced alignment

资金

  1. NSF [EECS-1344745, CHE-1213469]
  2. Duke University SMIF (Shared Materials Instrumentation Facilities)
  3. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A core/shell stretchable conductive composite of a few-walled carbon nanotube network coated on a poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) fiber (FWNT/PMIA) was fabricated by a dip-coating method and an annealing process that greatly enhanced interactions between the FWNT network and PMIA core as well as within the FWNT network. The first strain conductivity test of the as-prepared FWNT/PMIA fiber showed a stretching-induced alignment of nanotubes in the shell during the deformation process and a good conductivity stability with a slight conductivity drop from 109.63 S/cm to 98.74 5/cm (Delta sigma/sigma(0) = 10%) at a strain of similar to 150% (2.5 times the original length). More importantly, after the first stretching process, the fiber can be recovered with a slight increase in length but a greatly improved conductivity of 167.41 S/cm through an additional annealing treatment. The recovered fiber displays a similarly superb conductivity stability against stretching, with a decrease of only similar to 13 S/cm to 154.49 S/cm (Delta sigma/sigma(0) = 8%) at a strain of similar to 150%. We believe that this conductivity stability came from the formation and maintaining of aligned nanotube structures during the stretching process, which ensures the good tube tube contacts and the elongation of the FWNT network without losing its conductivity. Such stable conductivity in stretchable fibers will be important for applications in stretchable electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据