4.3 Article

Some biological features of Candida albicans mutants for genes coding fungal proteins containing the CFEM domain

期刊

FEMS YEAST RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 273-284

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00714.x

关键词

Fungal cell surface proteins; PGA10; RBT5 and CSA1; WAP1 genes; biofilms; atomic force microscopy; cell surface hydrophobicity

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia, Spain [BFU2005-02572]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain [ACOMP06/103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several biological features of Candida albicans genes (PGA10, RBT5 and CSA1) coding for putative polypeptide species belonging to a subset of fungal proteins containing an eight-cysteine domain referred as common in several fungal extracellular membrane (CFEM) are described. The deletion of these genes resulted in a cascade of pleiotropic effects. Thus, mutant strains exhibited higher cell surface hydrophobicity levels and an increased ability to bind to inert or biological substrates. Confocal scanning laser microscopy using concanavalin A-Alexafluor 488 (which binds to mannose and glucose residues) and FUN-1 (a cytoplasmic fluorescent probe for cell viability) dyes showed that mutant strains formed thinner and more fragile biofilms. These apparently contained lower quantities of extracellular matrix material and less metabolically active cells than their parental strain counterpart, although the relative percentage of mycelial forms was similar in all cases. The cell surface of C. albicans strains harbouring deletions for genes coding CFEM-domain proteins appeared to be severely altered according to atomic force microscopy observations. Assessment of the relative gene expression within individual C. albicans cells revealed that CFEM-coding genes were upregulated in mycelium, although these genes were shown not to affect virulence in animal models. Overall, this study has demonstrated that CFEM domain protein-encoding genes are pleiotropic, influencing cell surface characteristics and biofilm formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据