4.3 Article

Evaluation of environmental scanning electron microscopy for analysis of Proteus mirabilis crystalline biofilms in situ on urinary catheters

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 355, 期 1, 页码 20-27

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6968.12451

关键词

Proteus mirabilis; crystalline biofilm; environmental scanning electron microscopy; catheter-associated urinary tract infection

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0901553] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [G0901553] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0901553] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteus mirabilis is a common cause of catheter-associated urinary tract infections and frequently leads to blockage of catheters due to crystalline biofilm formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has proven to be a valuable tool in the study of these unusual biofilms, but entails laborious sample preparation that can introduce artefacts, undermining the investigation of biofilm development. In contrast, environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) permits imaging of unprocessed, fully hydrated samples, which may provide much insight into the development of P.mirabilis biofilms. Here, we evaluate the utility of ESEM for the study of P.mirabilis crystalline biofilms in situ, on urinary catheters. In doing so, we compare this to commonly used conventional SEM approaches for sample preparation and imaging. Overall, ESEM provided excellent resolution of biofilms formed on urinary catheters and revealed structures not observed in standard SEM imaging or previously described in other studies of these biofilms. In addition, we show that energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) may be employed in conjunction with ESEM to provide information regarding the elemental composition of crystalline structures and demonstrate the potential for ESEM in combination with EDS to constitute a useful tool in exploring the mechanisms underpinning crystalline biofilm formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据