4.3 Article

ΣB-dependent protein induction in Listeria monocytogenes during vancomycin stress

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 308, 期 1, 页码 94-100

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01998.x

关键词

Sigma B; vancomycin; proteomics; Listeria monocytogenes

资金

  1. Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Korea [A084798]
  2. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A084798] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Listeria monocytogenes is a food-borne pathogen that can survive under a wide range of environmental and energy stress conditions. The general stress response controlled by Sigma B largely contributes to stress resistance in L. monocytogenes. Moreover, the bacterial cell wall is the first defense against cellular stress and as such is the target of numerous antibiotics. We therefore hypothesize that Sigma B contributes to monitoring the integrity of cell walls. We evaluated Sigma B activity in wild type and delta sigB mutant L. monocytogenes containing reporter fusions (Sigma B-dependent opuCA promoter and a lacZ reporter gene) during the early exponential growth phase by measuring the specific activity of beta-galactosidase after vancomycin (2 mu g mL-1 final concentration) stress. Sigma B activity is significantly induced only in the wild-type strain by addition of vancomycin. In addition, we identified Sigma B-dependent vancomycin-inducible proteins using LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. Two independent proteomic analyses confirmed the minimum twofold upregulation of 18 vancomycin-inducible Sigma B-dependent stress response proteins in the wild-type strain compared with the delta sigB mutant. The functions of these proteins are associated with cell wall biogenesis, intracellular transport, general stress response, cell metabolism and virulence. These results suggest that the Sigma B protein may contribute to the monitoring of cell wall integrity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据