4.3 Article

Characterization of AtlL, a bifunctional autolysin of Staphylococcus lugdunensis with N-acetylglucosaminidase and N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase activities

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 290, 期 1, 页码 105-113

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01414.x

关键词

Staphylococcus lugdunensis; peptidoglycan hydrolase; N-acetylglucosaminidase; N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase; autolysin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nucleotide sequence of atlL, a gene encoding a putative Staphylococcus lugdunensis peptidoglycan hydrolase, was determined using degenerate consensus PCR and genome walking. This 3837-bp gene encodes a protein, AtlL, that appears as a putative bifunctional autolysin with a 29-amino acid putative signal peptide and two enzymatic putative centres (N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase and N-acetylglucosaminidase) interconnected with three imperfect repeated sequences displaying glycine-tryptophan motifs. In order to determine whether both lytic domains were functional, and verify their exact enzymatic activities, gene fragments harbouring both putative domains, AM (N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase enzymatic centre plus two repeated sequences) and GL (N-acetylglucosaminidase enzymatic centre plus one repeated sequence), were isolated, subcloned, and expressed in Escherichia coli. Purified recombinant AM and GL protein truncations exhibited cell wall lytic activity in zymograms performed with cell walls of Micrococcus lysodeikticus, Bacillus subtilis, and S. lugdunensis. AtlL is expressed during the whole growth, with an overexpression in the early-exponential stage. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of muropeptides generated by digestion of B. subtilis cell walls demonstrated the hydrolytic bond specificities and confirmed both of the acetyl domains' activities as predicted by sequence homology data. AtlL is the first autolysin described in S. lugdunensis, with a bifunctional enzymatic activity involved in peptidoglycan hydrolysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据