4.3 Review

Noncellulosomal cohesin- and dockerin-like modules in the three domains of life

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 291, 期 1, 页码 1-16

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01420.x

关键词

bioinformatics; cellulosome; enzyme complex; protein-protein interaction

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [422/05, 159/07]
  2. Alternative Energy Research Initiative (Weizmann Institute)
  3. United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF), Jerusalem, Israel
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health [MOP-77776]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high-affinity cohesin-dockerin interaction was originally discovered as modular components, which mediate the assembly of the various subunits of the multienzyme cellulosome complex that characterizes some cellulolytic bacteria. Until recently, the presence of cohesins and dockerins within a bacterial proteome was considered a definitive signature of a cellulosome-producing bacterium. Widespread genome sequencing has since revealed a wealth of putative cohesin- and dockerin-containing proteins in Bacteria, Archaea, and in primitive eukaryotes. The newly identified modules appear to serve diverse functions that are clearly distinct from the classical cellulosome archetype, and the vast majority of parent proteins are not predicted glycoside hydrolases. In most cases, only a few such genes have been identified in a given microorganism, which encode proteins containing but a single cohesin and/or dockerin. In some cases, one or the other module appears to be missing from a given species, and in other cases both modules occur within the same protein. This review provides a bioinformatics-based survey of the current status of cohesin- and dockerin-like sequences in species from the Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya. Surprisingly, many identified modules and their parent proteins are clearly unrelated to cellulosomes. The cellulosome paradigm may thus be the exception rather than the rule for bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic employment of cohesin and dockerin modules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据