4.5 Article

Unique and shared responses of the gut microbiota to prolonged fasting: a comparative study across five classes of vertebrate hosts

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 883-894

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12442

关键词

food restriction; host-microbe interactions; nutrient deprivation; starvation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB 1210094, DEB 1342615]
  2. Biaggini Research Fellowship
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1342615] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many animals face unpredictable food sources and periods of prolonged fasting, which likely present significant challenges to gut microorganisms. While several studies have demonstrated that fasting impacts the gut microbiota, experiments have not been carried out in a comparative context. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to document changes in colonic and cecal microbiomes of animals representing five classes of vertebrates at four time points through prolonged fasting: tilapia, toads, geckos, quail, and mice. We found differences in the starvation-induced changes in the microbiome across host species and across gut regions. Microbial phylogenetic diversity increased as a result of fasting in the colons of fish, toads, and mice, while quail exhibited a decrease in diversity; geckos exhibited no change. Microbial diversity in the cecum decreased in fish and exhibited no change in mice. Alterations in relative abundances of microbial taxa varied across hosts. Fish exhibited the most significant changes due to fasting, while geckos maintained a stable community over 28 days of fasting. We uncovered several shared responses of the microbiota across hosts. For example, all tetrapods exhibited decreases in the abundances of Coprobacillus and Ruminococcus in response to fasting. We also discuss host-mediated physiological mechanisms that may underlie these community changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据