4.5 Article

Extended tracking of the microbial community structure and dynamics in an industrial synthetic metalworking fluid system

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 87, 期 3, 页码 664-677

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12254

关键词

Metalworking fluid; real-time qPCR; DGGE; endotoxin

资金

  1. United Automobile Workers (UAW), Michigan
  2. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Center for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) [2R01OH007364]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding of the occupational exposure risk scenario and disease etiology associated with industrial metalworking fluids (MWFs) requires knowledge of the development and composition of their microbial diversity in relation to the underlying fluid management factors. In this study, a managed synthetic MWF operation freshly recharged following the dumping, cleaning, and recharge (DCR) process was tracked in real time for microbial community changes over a period of 1.25years (65weeks). The recharged fluid developed very high bacterial counts (viable and nonviable) fairly quickly after the DCR process, indicating its inadequacy. Genus-/group-specific real-time qPCR confirmed the prevalence of six potentially pathogenic/immunogenic microbial genera/groups, viz. pseudomonads, enterics, mycobacteria, legionellae, actinomycetes, and fungi. Selective culturing revealed Acinetobacter and Bacillus as the most frequently isolated Gram-negative and Gram-positive genera, respectively, in addition to the presence of fungi and actinomycetes. Endotoxin perturbations (<1000 to >100000EUmL(-1)) coincided with temporal increases in Gram-negative bacteria and/or periodic biocide additions. PCR-DGGE-sequencing revealed an expanded estimated bacterial richness (up to 23 bands per sample). Of the 16 dominant bacterial phylotypes identified, the majority were detected for the first time in MWF. Interestingly, the study revealed a crucial role for MWF brand, among other fluid factors, in modulating the community structure and dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据