4.5 Article

Influence of temperature and soil water content on bacterial, archaeal and denitrifying microbial communities in drained fen grassland soil microcosms

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 110-122

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00555.x

关键词

fen soil; temperature; soil water content; microcosms; T-RFLP; greenhouse gases

资金

  1. Slovenian Ministry of Higher Education ARRS [J4-6149-0481-04, P4-0116]
  2. Centre of Excellence for Environmental Technologies [3211-05000183]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, microcosms were used to investigate the influence of temperature (4 and 28 degrees C) and water content (45% and 90% WHC) on microbial communities and activities in carbon-rich fen soil. Bacterial, archaeal and denitrifier community composition was assessed during incubation of microcosms for 12 weeks using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) profiling of 16S rRNA and nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) genes. In addition, microbial and denitrifier abundance, potential denitrification activity and production of greenhouse gases were measured. No detectable changes were observed in prokaryote or denitrifier abundance. In general, cumulatively after 12 weeks more carbon was respired at the higher temperature (3.7 mg CO2 g(-1) soil), irrespective of the water content, whereas nitrous oxide production was greater under wet conditions (98-336 mu g N2O g(-1) soil). After an initial lag phase, methane emissions (963 mu g CH4 g(-1) soil) were observed only under warm and wet conditions. T-RFLP analyses of bacterial 16S rRNA and nosZ genes revealed small or undetectable community changes in response to temperature and water content, suggesting that bacterial and denitrifying microbial communities are stable and do not respond significantly to seasonal changes in soil conditions. In contrast, archaeal microbial community structure was more dynamic and was strongly influenced by temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据