4.5 Article

Biostimulation and bioaugmentation to enhance dechlorination of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins in contaminated sediments

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 271-281

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00557.x

关键词

anaerobic dechlorination; polychlorinated dioxins; biostimulation; bioaugmentation; Dehalococcoides ethenogenes

资金

  1. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program [CU-1208, ER-1492]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dechlorination of spiked 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (1,2,3,4-TeCDD) was investigated in sediment microcosms from three polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran (CDD/F)-contaminated sites: River Kymijoki, Finland; Gulf Island Pond, Maine; and Lake Roosevelt, Washington. Dechlorination was stimulated by addition of electron donor and halogenated priming compounds, and bioaugmentation by a mixed culture containing Dehalococcoides ethenogenes strain 195. Amendment with 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene (1,2,3,4-TeCB) promoted rapid dechlorination of 1,2,3,4-TeCDD to 2-monochlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2MCDD) in Gulf Island Pond and River Kymijoki sediments, however, only slow dechlorination to 1,4-dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin was observed in Lake Roosevelt sediments. The dechlorination pathway in 1,2,3,4-TeCB-amended microcosms proceeded mainly via 1,3-dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, with less production of 2,3-dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in comparison with other treatments. Microbial community analyses indicated that Dehalococcoides-like bacteria were enriched with 1,2,3,4-TeCB. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of Dehalococcoides-specific 16S rRNA genes and the D. ethenogenes strain 195 dehalogenase gene, tceA, showed at least an order of magnitude higher gene copy numbers in the bioaugmented than in the nonbioaugmented microcosms. An active-dechlorinating population is present in the River Kymijoki and biostimulation may enhance both native Dehalococcoides spp. and the bioaugmented D. ethenogenes strain 195.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据