4.5 Article

Dynamics of initial colonization of nonconserved perennial ryegrass by anaerobic fungi in the bovine rumen

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 66, 期 3, 页码 537-545

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00563.x

关键词

Neocallimastigales; rumen; colonization; ITS1; 5; 8S rRNA gene

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. Colciencias-LASPAU
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/W/00003135B, BBS/E/W/00003135A] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/W/00003135B, BBS/E/W/00003135A] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anaerobic fungi (Neocallimastigales) are active degraders of fibrous plant material in the rumen. However, only limited information is available relating to how quickly they colonize ingested feed particles. The aim of this study was to determine the dynamics of initial colonization of forage by anaerobic fungi in the rumen and the impact of different postsampling wash procedures used to remove loosely associated microorganisms. Neocallimastigales-specific molecular techniques were optimized to ensure maximal coverage before application to assess the population size (quantitative PCR) and composition (automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis) of the colonizing anaerobic fungi. Colonization of perennial ryegrass (PRG) was evident within 5 min, with no consistent effect of time or wash procedure on fungal population composition. Wash procedure had no effect on population size unlike time, which had a significant effect. Colonizing fungal population size continued to increase over the incubation period after an initial lag of c. 4 min. This dynamic differs from that reported previously for rumen bacteria, where substantial colonization of PRG occurred within 5 min. The observed delay in colonization of plant material by anaerobic fungi is suggested to be primarily mediated by the time taken for fungal zoospores to locate, attach and encyst on plant material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据