3.9 Article

A novel vaccine strategy to induce mycobacterial antigen-specific Th1 responses by utilizing the C-terminal domain of heat shock protein 70

期刊

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 189-196

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00762.x

关键词

Mycobacterium tuberculosis; heat shock protein; DNA vaccine; IFN-gamma

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  4. United States-Japan Cooperative Medical Science Committee
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22590855] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) is a member of a highly conserved superfamily of intracellular chaperones called stress proteins that can activate innate and adaptive immune responses. We evaluated the effect of a fusion DNA vaccine that encoded mycobacterial HSP70 and MPT51, a major secreted protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Spleen cells from mice immunized with fusion DNA of full-length HSP70 and MPT51 produced a higher amount of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) in response to the CD4+, but not the CD8+ T-cell epitope peptide on MPT51 than those from mice immunized with MPT51 DNA. Furthermore, because HSP70 comprises the N-terminal ATPase domain and the C-terminal peptide-binding domain, we attempted to identify the domain responsible for its enhancing effect. The fusion DNA vaccine that encoded the C-terminal domain of HSP70 and MPT51 induced a higher MPT51-specific IFN-gamma production by CD4+ T cells than the vaccine that encoded MPT51 alone, whereas that with the N-terminal domain did not. Similar results were obtained by immunization with the fusion proteins. These results suggest that the DNA vaccine that encodes a chimeric antigen molecule fused with mycobacterial HSP70, especially with its C-terminal domain, can induce a stronger antigen-specific T-helper cell type 1 response than antigen DNA alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据