3.9 Article

Hydrogen peroxide-mediated induction of the Shiga toxin-converting lambdoid prophage ST2-8624 in Escherichia coli O157:H7

期刊

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 322-329

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00644.x

关键词

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC); prophage induction; oxidative stress; hydrogen peroxide

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N301 122 31/3747]
  2. European Union [POIG.01.01.02-00-008/08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) may cause bloody diarrhea and hemorrhagic colitis, with sometimes severe complications. Because genes coding for Shiga toxins are located on lambdoid prophages, effective toxin production occurs only after prophage induction. However, although agents that effectively induce prophage lambda (a paradigm of the family of lambdoid phages) under laboratory conditions, such as UV irradiation or DNA replication inhibitors, are well known, it is unlikely that such factors are present in human intestine infected with STEC. In this report, we demonstrate that induction of a Shiga toxin-converting prophage in its host (E. coli O157:H7) occurs not only in the presence of DNA-interfering antibiotics (mitomycin C and norfloxacin) but also under conditions of oxidative stress [following treatment with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)]. Under these conditions, we observed not only effective prophage induction but also expression of the reporter gene (replacing the original stx2 gene). In the light of previously published reports, indicating that oxidative stress conditions might occur during colonization of human intestine by enteric bacteria, and that neutrophil-produced H2O2 can increase production of the Shiga toxin in a clinical isolate of STEC, these results suggest that oxidative stress may be one of the agents responsible for stimulating the pathogenicity determinants of STEC, leading to induction of Shiga toxin-converting prophages in these bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据