3.9 Review

The distributed genome hypothesis as a rubric for understanding evolution in situ during chronic bacterial biofilm infectious processes

期刊

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 3, 页码 269-279

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00704.x

关键词

chronic bacterial pathogenesis; bacteria; horizontal gene transfer; distributed genome hypothesis; supragenome; pangenome

资金

  1. Allegheny General Hospital
  2. Allegheny Singer Research Institute
  3. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
  4. Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
  5. NIH [DC04173, DC02148, DC02148-16S1, AI080935]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most chronic infectious disease processes associated with bacteria are characterized by the formation of a biofilm that provides for bacterial attachment to the host tissue or the implanted medical device. The biofilm protects the bacteria from the host's adaptive immune response as well as predation by phagocytic cells. However, the most insidious aspect of biofilm biology from the host's point of view is that the biofilm provides an ideal setting for bacterial horizontal gene transfer (HGT). HGT provides for large-scale genome content changes in situ during the chronic infectious process. Obviously, for HGT processes to result in the reassortment of alleles and genes among bacterial strains, the infection must be polyclonal (polymicrobial) in nature. In this review, we marshal the evidence that all of the factors are present in biofilm infections to support HGT that results in the ongoing production of novel strains with unique combinations of genic characteristics and that the continual production of large numbers of novel, but related bacterial strains leads to persistence. This concept of an infecting population of bacteria undergoing mutagenesis to produce a 'cloud' of similar strains to confuse and overwhelm the host's immune system parallels genetic diversity strategies used by viral and parasitic pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据