3.9 Article

Global gene expression patterns and induction of innate immune response in human laryngeal epithelial cells in response to Acinetobacter baumannii outer membrane protein A

期刊

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 45-52

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00446.x

关键词

outer membrane protein; cDNA microarray; inducible nitric oxide synthase; TLR2; cytokines

资金

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation, Korea [R01-2005-000-10880-0]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [R01-2005-000-10880-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The outer membrane protein A of Acinetobacter baumannii (AbOmpA) is an important pathogen-associated molecular pattern that induces host cell death. We determined the gene expression profiles of human laryngeal epithelial HEp-2 cells in response to the sublethal concentration of recombinant AbOmpA (rAbOmpA) and investigated the molecular mechanisms by which rAbOmpA induces an innate immune response. The microarray analysis showed that rAbOmpA sequentially regulated a relatively small set of genes, including those associated with signal transductions and molecules involved in immune response. Among the differentially expressed genes involved in innate immune responses, the surface expression of Toll-like receptor 2 and the production of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) were prominently observed. However, rAbOmpA did not induce the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. rAbOmpA activated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). Inhibition of JNK MAPK suppressed iNOS production in the rAbOmpA-treated HEp-2 cells. These results suggest that interaction of laryngeal epithelial cells with AbOmpA has a significant impact on the induction of innate immunity during the early stages of A. baumannii infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据