4.1 Article

Bacterial communities during the process of high-temperature Daqu production of roasted sesame-like flavour liquor

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF BREWING
卷 121, 期 3, 页码 440-448

出版社

INST BREWING
DOI: 10.1002/jib.235

关键词

Daqu; sesame flavour liquor; bacterial community; 16S rDNA clone library; culture-independent

资金

  1. National Twelfth Five-year Science and Technology Project [2012BAK17B11]
  2. Scientific and Technological Development Project (Doctoral Scientific Research Fund) of China National Research Institute of Food and Fermentation Industries [2012KJFZ-BS-01)]
  3. Shandong Bandaojing Liquor Corp.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial communities in fermentative high-temperature Daqu play an important role in the Chinese roasted sesame-like flavour liquor brewing process. A culture-independent method of 16S rDNA clone library was applied to investigate the changes in bacterial diversity during the process of a Daqu fermentation. The results indicated that the types of bacteria species gradually increased with prolonged fermentation time. The first dominant bacterium, Pantoea sp. (73.68%), in the raw material was only detected at the beginning of the fermentation stage (8 days) in small quantities. The second dominant bacterium, Weissella sp. (16.99%) and the third, Lactobacillus sp. (4.57%), were both detected in the beginning fermentation sample (3.22, 11.29%), in the ripening fermentation sample (24 days; 6.89, 25.11%) and in the drying stage (49 days; 3.74, 7.47%). In the beginning fermentation, Thermoactinomyces sp. (47.57%) was detected as the first predominant bacterium, and it was also detected in the ripening fermentation stage (4.93%) and in the drying stage (15.68%). The bacterial communities in the Daqu fermentation process affected the physicochemical index of Daqu. A molecular analysis of the bacterial community from the Daqu fermentation process will benefit studies on the aroma production mechanisms from these bacteria. Copyright (C) 2015 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据