4.5 Article

Investigations on in-vessel melt retention by external cooling for a generic VVER-1000 reactor

期刊

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 249-260

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.044

关键词

Corium; In-vessel melt retention; External flooding; Segregated pool; Heat transfer; Finite element analysis

资金

  1. EC-SARNET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

External or internal hazards, combined with multiple failures of components and safety systems or human errors can lead to a reactor core melt. In that case the reactor pressure vessel is the last barrier to keep the molten materials inside the reactor and to prevent further challenges to the nuclear power plant structures and consequently to the environment. In-vessel melt retention by external vessel cooling is a possible mitigative severe accident measure. Up to the moment it is not considered as a severe accident management strategy for VVER-1000 reactors. In this paper we analyse the possibility of in-vessel melt retention for a generic pressurized water VVER-1000 reactor during the late in-vessel phase of a postulated station blackout scenario. We developed a numerical model describing the thermal behaviour of a segregated molten pool situated in the lower plenum of the reactor pressure vessel and the thermo-mechanic behaviour of the vessel wall. The flnite element code ANSYS (R) was used for the simulations. The results show that the highest thermo-mechanical loads are observed in the vertical part of the vessel wall, which is in contact with the molten metal. Parameter studies on the thickness of the metal layer have also been performed. Without flooding, the vessel wall will fail, as the necessary temperature for a balanced heat release from the external surface via radiation is near to or above the melting point of the steel. However, the external flooding could help the retention of the corium within the reactor pressure vessel. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据