4.6 Article

Sodium butyrate inhibits platelet-derived growth factor-induced proliferation and migration in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells through Akt inhibition

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 280, 期 9, 页码 2042-2055

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/febs.12227

关键词

Akt; cell migration; cell proliferation; pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells; sodium butyrate

资金

  1. Ministero della Salute, Italy, Ricerca Finalizzata - Progetti Cellule Staminali
  2. Fondazione Fornasini, Poggio Renatico, Italy
  3. Fondazione Cardinale Giacomo Lercaro, Bologna, Italy
  4. Tavola Valdese, Rome, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium butyrate (BU) is a molecule that acts as a histone deacetylase inhibitor. As compared with its well-known antineoplastic/antiproliferative effects, little is known about BU action on vascular cell dynamics. An imbalance of proliferation and migration in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) is essential in the onset and progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a disease that is characterized by vascular lung derangement and that frequently has an unfavorable outcome. Here, we show that, in PASMCs of PAH rats, BU counteracted platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-induced Ki67 expression, and arrested the cell cycle, mainly at G0/G1. BU decreased proliferating cell nuclear antigen, c-Myc and cyclinD1 transcription and protein expression, while increasing p21 expression. BU reduced the transcription of PDGF receptor-, and that of Ednra and Ednrb, two major receptors in PAH progression. Wound healing, migration and pulmonary artery ring assays indicated that BU inhibited PDGF-induced PASMC migration. BU strongly inhibited PDGF-induced Akt phosphorylation, an effect reversed by the phosphatase inhibitor calyculinA. BU-treated cells showed a remarkable increase in acetylated Akt, indicating an inverse relationship between the levels of acetylated Akt and phospho-Akt. These findings may provide novel perspectives on the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors in PAH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据