4.6 Article

ATP binding to human serine racemase is cooperative and modulated by glycine

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 280, 期 22, 页码 5853-5863

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/febs.12510

关键词

allostery; ATP; cooperativity; d-serine; enzyme regulation; fluorescence; neuropathologies; NMDA receptor; PLP; serine racemase

资金

  1. Italian Ministery of University and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The N-methyl d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors play a key role in excitatory neurotransmission, and control learning, memory and synaptic plasticity. Their activity is modulated by the agonist glutamate and by the co-agonists d-serine and glycine. In the human brain, d-serine is synthesized from l-serine by the dimeric pyridoxal 5-phosphate-dependent enzyme serine racemase, which also degrades l- and d-serine to pyruvate and ammonia. The dependence of l- and d-serine -elimination and l-serine racemization activities on ATP concentration was characterized, and was found to be strongly cooperative, with Hill coefficients close to 2 and apparent ATP dissociation constants ranging from 0.22 to 0.41mm. ATP binding to the holo-enzyme, monitored by the fluorescence changes of the coenzyme, was also determined to be cooperative, with an apparent dissociation constant of 0.24mm. Glycine, an active-site ligand, increased the serine racemase affinity for ATP by 22-fold, abolishing cooperativity. Conversely, ATP increased the non-cooperative glycine binding15-fold. These results indicate cross-talk between allosteric and active sites, leading to the stabilization of two alternative protein conformations with ATP affinities of 10M and 1.8mm, as evaluated within the Monod, Wyman and Changeux model. Therefore, intracellular ATP and glycine control d-serine homeostasis, and, indirectly, NMDA receptor activity. Because hyper- and hypo-activation of NMDA receptors are associated with neuropathologies, the development of allosteric drugs modulating serine racemase activity is a promising therapeutic strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据