4.6 Article

Muscle phospholipid hydrolysis by Bothrops asper Asp49 and Lys49 phospholipase A2 myotoxins - distinct mechanisms of action

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 280, 期 16, 页码 3878-3886

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/febs.12386

关键词

fatty acids; lysophospholipids; PLA(2) activity; snake myotoxins; toxicity

资金

  1. Universita di Padova Progetto Strategico 'An in vivo Approach to the Physiopathology of Signal Transduction'
  2. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo
  3. International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Collaborative Research Programme Program [COS-08-03]
  4. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bothrops snakes are the major cause of ophidian envenomings in Latin America. Mt-I and Mt-II, which share the phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)) fold, but Mt-II lacks enzymatic activity because the essential active site Asp49 is replaced by Lys. Both myotoxins cause sarcolemma alterations, with Ca2+ entry and loss of A and K+ from muscle cells, but the molecular lesions at the basis of their cellular action are not known, particularly the role of phospholipid hydrolysis. Here we tested their PLA(2) activity invivo, and evaluated the hypothesis that Ca2+-activated endogenous PLA(2)s may be involved in the action of Mt-II. Mt-I and Mt-II in myotubes in culture and in tibialis anterior mouse muscles was determined. Mt-I rapidly hydrolyzed phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine but not phosphatidylserine, but no phospho-lipids were hydrolyzed in the presence of Mt-II. Whole Bothropsasper venom induced a higher extent of phospholipid hydrolysis than Mt-I alone. invivo PLA(2) activity of Mt-I for the first time, and indicate that it acts only on the external monolayer of the sarcolemma. PLA(2)s in the action of Mt-II, implying that plasma membrane disruption by this toxin does not depend on phospholipid hydrolysis. Bothrops myotoxins induce Ca2+ entry and release of A and cause myonecrosis, but through different biochemical mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据