4.6 Article

Cytosolic, but not mitochondrial, oxidative stress is a likely contributor to cardiac hypertrophy resulting from cardiac specific GLUT4 deletion in mice

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 279, 期 4, 页码 599-611

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08450.x

关键词

antioxidant; cardiac hypertrophy; GLUT4; mitochondria; p67phox; ROS

资金

  1. NIH [HL085226, UO1 HL 70525, 087947]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We hypothesized that oxidative stress may contribute to the development of hypertrophy observed in mice with cardiac specific ablation of the insulin sensitive glucose transporter 4 gene (GLUT4, G4H-/-). Measurements of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) in isolated mitochondria and whole heart homogenates were increased resulting in a lower ratio of reduced glutathione (GSH) to GSSG. Membrane translocation of the p67phox subunit of cardiac NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2) was markedly increased in G4H-/- mice, suggesting elevated activity. To determine if oxidative stress was contributing to cardiac hypertrophy, 4-week-old control (Con) and G4H-/- mice were treated with either tempol (T, 1 mm, drinking water), a whole cell antioxidant, or Mn(III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin chloride (MnTBAP, 10 mg center dot kg-1, intraperitoneally), a mitochondrial targeted antioxidant, for 28 days. Tempol attenuated cardiac hypertrophy in G4H-/- mice (heart : tibia, Con 6.82 +/- 0.35, G4H-/- 8.83 +/- 0.34, Con + T 6.82 +/- 0.46, G4H-/- + T 7.57 +/- 0.3), without changing GSH : GSSG, glutathione peroxidase 4 or membrane translocation of the p67phox. Tempol did not modify phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta or thioredoxin-2. In contrast, MnTBAP lowered mitochondrial GSSG and improved GSH : GSSG, but did not prevent hypertrophy, indicating that mitochondrial oxidative stress may not be critical for hypertrophy in this model. The ability of tempol to attenuate cardiac hypertrophy suggests that a cytosolic source of reactive oxygen species, probably NOX2, may contribute to the hypertrophic phenotype in G4H-/- mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据