4.6 Article

Role of phosphate in the central metabolism of two lactic acid bacteria - a comparative systems biology approach

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 279, 期 7, 页码 1274-1290

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08523.x

关键词

glycolysis; kinetic modelling; Lactococcus lactis; phosphate uptake; Streptococcus pyogenes

资金

  1. SysMO-LAB (Systems Biology of Microorganisms - Lactic acid bacteria)
  2. Kluyver Center for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation
  3. Netherlands Genomics Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactic acid-producing bacteria survive in distinct environments, but show common metabolic characteristics. Here we studied the dynamic interactions of the central metabolism in Lactococcus lactis, extensively used as a starter culture in the dairy industry, and Streptococcus pyogenes, a human pathogen. Glucose-pulse experiments and enzymatic measurements were performed to parameterize kinetic models of glycolysis. Significant improvements were made to existing kinetic models for L. lactis, which subsequently accelerated the development of the first kinetic model of S. pyogenes glycolysis. The models revealed an important role for extracellular phosphate in the regulation of central metabolism and the efficient use of glucose. Thus, phosphate, which is rarely taken into account as an independent species in models of central metabolism, should be considered more thoroughly in the analysis of metabolic systems in the future. Insufficient phosphate supply can lead to a strong inhibition of glycolysis at high glucose concentrations in both species, but this was more severe in S. pyogenes. S. pyogenes is more efficient at converting glucose to ATP, showing a higher tendency towards heterofermentative energy metabolism than L. lactis. Our comparative systems biology approach revealed that the glycolysis of L. lactis and S. pyogenes have similar characteristics, but are adapted to their individual natural habitats with respect to phosphate regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据