4.6 Article

Subtype specificity interaction of bactridines with mammalian, insect and bacterial sodium channels under voltage clamp conditions

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 279, 期 21, 页码 4025-4038

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08808.x

关键词

bactridines; NaV channels; scorpion; sequence; Tityus discrepans

资金

  1. Venezuelan FONACIT [S1-2001000908]
  2. FONDEN [416]
  3. Mision Ciencia [200700642]
  4. F.W.O. Vlaanderen [G.0433.12]
  5. Inter-University Attraction Poles Program, Belgian State, Belgian Science Policy [IUAP 7/19]
  6. KU Leuven [OT/12/081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work demonstrates that bactridines (Bacts) possess different selectivities for neuronal and muscular voltage-dependent sodium (NaV) channels, with subtle differences on channel isoforms. Bacts 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 (100 nm) reduced the peak current of several skeletal and neuronal channel isoforms selectively. Bacts 2 and 3 were more potent on Na(V)1.4, Bacts 4 and 6 on Na(V)1.3 and Bact 5 on Na(V)1.7. Bactridines (except Bacts 1 and 5) caused a hyperpolarizing shift in the V(1/)2 of activation and inactivation of Na(V)1.3, Na(V)1.4 and NaV1.6. Voltage shifts of Boltzmann curves fitted to activation and inactivation occurred with a decrease in kappa. Since the slope is proportional to kappa = RT/zF, changes in kappa probably express changes in z, the valence, in a voltage-dependent manner. Changes in z may express toxin-induced changes in the channel ionic environment, perhaps due to surface charges of the molecules. Bact 2 induced a Na(V)1.2 voltage shift of the activation curves but no shift of the mutant Na(V)1.2 IFM/QQQ; peak I-Na was reduced in both channel forms, suggesting that channel blockage resulted from toxin binding to a site partially distinct from the a subunit binding site 4. Bactridines emerge as potential research tools to understand sodium channel isoform structurefunction relationships and also as pharmacologically interesting peptides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据