4.6 Review

Structural and functional aspects of unique type IV secretory components in the Helicobacter pylori cag-pathogenicity island

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 278, 期 8, 页码 1223-1231

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08038.x

关键词

3D structure; Cag proteins; gastric cancer; Helicobacter pylori; type IV secretion system

资金

  1. University of Padua, Italy
  2. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca, MIUR [2007LHN9JL]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Helicobacter pylori cytotoxin-associated gene-pathogenicity island (cagPAI) is responsible for the secretion of the CagA effector through a type IV secretion system (T4SS) apparatus, as well as of peptidoglycan and possibly other not yet identified factors. Twenty-nine different polypeptide chains are encoded by this cluster of genes, although only some of them show a significant similarity with the constitutive elements of well characterized secretion systems from other bacteria. The other cagPAI components represent almost unique proteins in this scenario. The majority of the T4SS include approximately fifteen components, taking into account either the transmembrane complex subunits, ATPases or substrate factors. The composition of the cagPAI is very complex: it includes proteins most likely involved at different levels in the pilus assembly, stabilization and processing of secreted substrate, as well as regulatory particles possibly involved in the control of the entire apparatus. Despite recent findings with respect to components that play a role in the interaction with the host cell, the function of several cagPAI proteins remains unclear or unknown. This is particularly true for those that represent unique members with no clear similarity to those of other T4SS and no obvious evidence of involvement in the secretion of CagA or induction of pro-inflammatory responses. We summarize what is known about these accessory components, both from a molecular and structural point of view, as well as their putative physiological role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据