4.6 Article

Phylogenetic and functional features of the plastid transcription kinase cpCK2 from Arabidopsis signify a role of cysteinyl SH-groups in regulatory phosphorylation of plastid sigma factors

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 279, 期 3, 页码 395-409

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08433.x

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; chloroplast transcription kinase; promoter binding; SH-group redox control; sigma factor phosphorylation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [LI261/21-1, FOR387, SFB480/B7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A plastidic serine/threonine protein kinase, initially named plastid transcription kinase (PTK) has been implicated in phosphorylation and redox control of chloroplast transcription. This kinase was later renamed as chloroplast casein kinase 2 (cpCK2) because of its physical and functional similarity to nucleocytosolic casein kinase 2 (ncCK2). It shares all four of its cysteine residues with ncCK2 from land plants, while only three of these residues are conserved in algal CK2-type sequences, and just two in animals. Using bacterial overexpression of cpCK2 from Arabidopsis thaliana, here we show the principal features of this enzyme and assign functional determinants of its role as a transcriptional regulator in vitro. The recombinant protein is capable of using various plant sigma transcription factors as phosphorylation substrates. Electrophoretic mobility shift DNA-binding assays reveal differential effects of sigma phosphorylation, depending on the factor and the promoter used. Treatment of the kinase with redox-active reagents indicate a critical involvement of thiol groups in both its enzymatic activity and interaction capabilities. Mutational exchanges of cysteine to serine residues, in combination with in vitro assays, have provided clues to the possible role of individual cysteines. For instance, while Cys4 but not Cys2 is essential for activity, the latter seems to be involved in the formation of intermolecular (regulatory) disulfide bonds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据