4.6 Article

Identification of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 as a critical component that induces post-transcriptional activation of I?B-?

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 279, 期 2, 页码 211-222

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08416.x

关键词

interleukin-1 (IL-1); interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK1); I?B-; post-transcriptional regulation; Toll-like receptor

资金

  1. KAKENHI [21117004, 21390088, 21200040]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Naito Foundation
  4. Asahi Grass Foundation
  5. Suzuken Memorial Foundation
  6. Novartis Foundation for the Promotion of Science
  7. Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21390088, 11J06972, 22117001, 22117002, 21117004, 21200040] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

I?B-?, an essential inflammatory regulator, is specifically induced by Toll-like receptor ligands or interleukin (IL)-1 beta by post-transcriptional activation mediated via a 165-nucleotide element in I B- mRNA. Here, we analyzed the Toll-like receptorIL-1 receptor signaling components involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of I?B-? with mutated estrogen receptor [ER(T2)] fusion proteins. Upon 4-hydroxytamoxifen treatment, the ER(T2) fusion proteins with IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK)1 and IRAK4 elicited specific activation of a reporter gene for the post-transcriptional regulation of I?B-?. The tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF)6ER(T2) protein activated nuclear factor-?B, but not post-transcriptional regulation, indicating that activation of IRAK1/4, but not of TRAF6, is sufficient to activate the 165-nucleotide element-mediated post-transcriptional mechanism. Interestingly, the post-transcriptional mechanism was not activated in TRAF6-deficient cells, indicating an essential role for TRAF6. Thus, the signaling pathway leading to nuclear factor-?B activation and the post-transcriptional activation bifurcates at IRAK1, suggesting a new pathway activated by IRAK1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据