4.4 Article

Fracturing and fluid flow in a sub-decollement sandstone; or, a leak in the basement

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY
卷 172, 期 4, 页码 428-442

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC PUBL HOUSE
DOI: 10.1144/jgs2014-128

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, US Department of Energy [DE-FG0203ER15430]
  2. GDL Foundation
  3. Fracture Research and Application Consortium
  4. Geology Foundation of the Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crack-seal texture within fracture cements in the Triassic El Alamar Formation, NE Mexico, shows that the fractures opened during precipitation of quartz cements; later, overlapping calcite cements further occluded pore space. Previous workers defined four systematic fracture sets, A (oldest) to D (youngest), with relative timing constrained by crosscutting relationships. Quartz fluid inclusion homogenization temperatures are higher within Set B (148 +/- 20 degrees C) than in Set C (105 +/- 12 degrees C). These data and previous burial history modelling are consistent with Set C forming during exhumation. Fluid inclusions in Set C quartz have higher salinity than those in Set B (22.9 v. 14.2wt% NaCl equivalent, respectively), and Set C quartz cement is more enriched in O-18 (20.2 v. 18.7 parts per thousand VSMOW). Under most assumptions about the true temperature during fracture opening, the burial duration, the amount of cement precipitated and fluid-flow patterns, it appears that the fracture fluid became depleted in O-18 and enriched in C-13. This isotopic evolution, combined with increasing salinity, suggests that throughout fracture opening there was a gravity-driven influx of fluid from upsection Jurassic evaporites, which form a regional decollement. Fracture opening amid downward fluid motion suggests that fracturing was driven by external stresses such as tectonic stretching or unloading, rather than increases in fluid pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据