4.6 Article

Protein tandem repeats - the more perfect, the less structured

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 277, 期 12, 页码 2673-2682

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07684.x

关键词

bioinformatics; disordered conformation; evolution; protein structure; sequence analysis

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01 LM007688-01A1, GM071-714-01A2]
  2. National Science Foundation [EF 0849803]
  3. Russian Academy of Sciences for 'Molecular and Cellular Biology'
  4. IUPUI Signature Centres Initiative.
  5. Ministere de l'Education Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie (MENRT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analysed the structural properties of protein regions containing arrays of perfect and nearly perfect tandem repeats. Naturally occurring proteins with perfect repeats are practically absent among the proteins with known 3D structures. The great majority of such regions in the Protein Data Bank are found in the proteins designed de novo. The abundance of natural structured proteins with tandem repeats is inversely correlated with the repeat perfection: the chance of finding natural structured proteins in the Protein Data Bank increases with a decrease in the level of repeat perfection. Prediction of intrinsic disorder within the tandem repeats in the SwissProt proteins supports the conclusion that the level of repeat perfection correlates with their tendency to be unstructured. This correlation is valid across the various species and subcellular localizations, although the level of disordered tandem repeats varies significantly between these datasets. On average, in prokaryotes, tandem repeats of cytoplasmic proteins were predicted to be the most structured, whereas in eukaryotes, the most structured portion of the repeats was found in the membrane proteins. Our study supports the hypothesis that, in general, the repeat perfection is a sign of recent evolutionary events rather than of exceptional structural and (or) functional importance of the repeat residues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据