4.6 Article

In vitro characterization of Synechocystis CYP120A1 revealed the first nonanimal retinoic acid hydroxylase

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 276, 期 19, 页码 5416-5431

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07224.x

关键词

beta-apo-13-carotenone; carotenoid cleavage; cyanobacteria; cytochrome P450; retinoic acid

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. Graduiertenkolleg [1305]
  3. Signalsysteme in pflanzlichen Modellorganismen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinoids are C-20 apocarotenoids that have various important functions in metazoans. In addition, several findings suggest their occurrence in eubacteria, including cyanobacteria. It has been shown that the Synechocystis cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP120A1 is a retinoic acid-binding polypeptide. In this work, we determined the reaction catalyzed by CYP120A1 and investigated its substrate specificity in vitro. CYP120A1-containing microsomes generated in yeast converted all-trans-retinoic acid into a compound exhibiting higher polarity in HPLC analysis. Liquid chromatography-MS analysis suggested the introduction of a single hydroxyl group, and NMR analysis of the purified product revealed C-16 or C-17 as the reaction site. Incubations with cis-retinoic acids, retinal, 3(R)-OH-retinal, retinol, beta-apo-13-carotenone (C-18) and beta-apo-14'-carotenal (C-22) resulted in the formation of the corresponding hydroxyl derivatives, as suggested by HPLC and liquid chromatography-MS analyses. Comparisons of the relative product amounts revealed the highest conversion rate for all-trans-retinoic acid, followed by beta-apo-13-carotenone (C-18). As shown by real-time RT-PCR, CYP120A1 is expressed under normal growth conditions and is slightly induced by high-intensity light. Our work provides the first enzymatic study of a cyanobacterial cytochrome P450, showing it to be the first nonanimal retinoic acid-metabolizing enzyme characterized so far. Moreover, the CYP120A1-catalyzed reaction represents a novel modification of retinoids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据