4.6 Article

NF-κB regulates the transcription of protein tyrosine kinase Tec

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 276, 期 22, 页码 6714-6724

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07385.x

关键词

Bortezomib; hydrodynamic transfection; NF-kappa B; Tec; transcription

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Fund
  2. Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Swedish Science Council
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  6. Swedish Hemophilia Society and Stockholm County Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (Tec) is a non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) that is expressed in hematopoietic cells, such as B and T lymphocytes, myeloid lineage cells and neutrophils. Mutations in the human Btk gene cause X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA), but the corresponding mutation in mice results in a much milder defect. However, the combined inactivation of Btk and Tec genes in mice cause a severe phenotype resembling XLA. Tec is involved in the regulation of both B and T lymphocytes, fine-tuning of TCR/BCR signaling, and also activation of the nuclear factor of activated T cells. Previous work has shown that the transcription factors Sp1 and PU.1 can bind and regulate the Tec promoter. In this study, we demonstrate that NF-kappa B is an essential transcription factor for optimal expression of the Tec gene, and identify a unique functionally active NF-kappa B binding site in its promoter. The NF-kappa B subunit p65/RelA directly induced transcriptional activity of the Tec promoter. Moreover, we also found that proteasome inhibitors, including Bortezomib, repress Tec transcription through inactivation of the NF-kappa B signaling pathway. This study, together with our previous findings on the transcriptional regulation of Btk (Bruton's tyrosine kinase) by proteasome inhibitors, provides important insight into the molecular mechanism(s) underlying the role of NF-kappa B in Tec family kinase signaling and lymphocyte development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据