4.6 Review

Parkinson's disease: Levodopa-induced dyskinesia and signal transduction

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 275, 期 7, 页码 1392-1399

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06296.x

关键词

1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine; 6-hydroxydopamine; cAMP-dependent protein kinase; DA; and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa; dopamine D1 receptor; extracellular signal-regulated kinase; immediate early genes; medium spiny neurons; phosphorylation; striatum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa) remains the most effective pharmacological treatment for relief of the severe motor impairments of Parkinson's disease. It is very effective in controlling parkinsonian symptoms in the initial phase of the disease, but its action wanes with time. Such 'wearing-off' imposes an escalation in the dosage of the drug, which ultimately fails to provide stable control of motor symptoms and results in the appearance of abnormal involuntary movements or dyskinesia. 'Peak-dose'L-dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) currently represents one of the major challenges in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Accumulating evidence suggests that LID derives from overstimulation of dopamine receptors located on the GABAergic medium spiny neurons (MSNs) of the dorsal striatum. These neurons form two distinct projection pathways, which exert opposite effects on motor activity: the direct, striatonigral pathway promotes locomotion, whereas the indirect, striatopallidal pathway depresses locomotion. In order to understand the mechanisms underlying LID, it is important to identify molecular adaptations produced by chronic administration of L-dopa, at the level of one or the other of these two neuronal populations. This review summarizes the results of recent studies indicating that LID is associated with abnormal dopamine D1 receptor signaling affecting the MSNs of the direct pathway. The role of this pathological adaptation and of the consequent changes in signaling in the development and expression of LID are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据