4.6 Review

Membrane compartments and purinergic signalling: P2X receptors in neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory events

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 276, 期 2, 页码 354-364

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06796.x

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ATP; cell death; extracellular ATP; Huntington's disease; ischaemia; multiple sclerosis; nervous system; P2 receptors; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. Cofinanziamenti MIUR
  2. Ministero della Salute [RF05.105V]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ATP is a potent signalling molecule abundantly present in the nervous system, where it exerts physiological actions ranging from short-term responses such as neurotransmission, neuromodulation and glial communication, to long-term effects such as trophic actions. The fast signalling targets of extracellular ATP are represented by the ionotropic P2X receptors, which are broadly and abundantly expressed in neurons and glia in the whole central and peripheral nervous systems. Because massive extracellular release of ATP often occurs by lytic and non-lytic mechanisms, especially after stressful events and pathological conditions, purinergic signalling is correlated to and involved in the aetiopathology and/or progression of many neurodegenerative diseases. In this minireview, we highlight the contribution of the subclass of ionotropic P2X receptors to several diseases of the human nervous system, such as neurodegenerative disorders and immune-mediated neuroinflammatory dysfunctions including ischaemia, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and Huntington's diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multiple sclerosis. The role of P2X receptors as novel and effective targets for the genetic/pharmacological manipulation of purinergic mechanisms in several neuropathological conditions is now well established. Nevertheless, any successful therapeutic intervention against these diseases cannot be restricted to P2X receptors, but should take into consideration the whole and multipart ATP signalling machinery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据