4.7 Article

RhoA mediates defective stem cell function and heterotopic ossification in dystrophic muscle of mice

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 3619-3631

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.13-233460

关键词

ROCK; mdx; utrophin; -SUP; intramyocellular lipid accumulation

资金

  1. Henry J. Mankin endowed chair at the University of Pittsburgh
  2. William F. and Jean W. Donaldson endowed chair at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterotopic ossification (HO) and fatty infiltration (FI) often occur in diseased skeletal muscle and have been previously described in various animal models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD); however, the pathological mechanisms remain largely unknown. Dystrophin-deficient mdx mice and dystrophin/utrophin double-knockout (dKO) mice are mouse models of DMD; however, mdx mice display a strong muscle regeneration capacity, while dKO mice exhibit a much more severe phenotype, which is similar to patients with DMD. Our results revealed that more extensive HO, but not FI, occurred in the skeletal muscle of dKO mice versus mdx mice, and RhoA activation specifically occurred at the sites of HO. Moreover, the gene expression of RhoA, BMPs, and several inflammatory factors were significantly up-regulated in muscle stem cells isolated from dKO mice; while inactivation of RhoA in the cells with RhoA/ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 led to reduced osteogenic potential and improved myogenic potential. Finally, inactivation of RhoA signaling in the dKO mice with Y-27632 improved muscle regeneration and reduced the expression of BMPs, inflammation, HO, and intramyocellular lipid accumulation in both skeletal and cardiac muscle. Our results revealed that RhoA represents a major molecular switch in the regulation of HO and muscle regeneration in dystrophic skeletal muscle of mice.Mu, X., Usas, A., Tang, Y., Lu, A., Wang, B., Weiss, K., Huard, J. RhoA mediates defective stem cell function and heterotopic ossification in dystrophic muscle of mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据