4.7 Article

MicroRNA-205 promotes keratinocyte migration via the lipid phosphatase SHIP2

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 3950-3959

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.10-157404

关键词

cell signaling; cell survival; corneal epithelium; epidermis

资金

  1. NIH [EY017536, EY019463]
  2. U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [P30AR057216]
  3. Dermatology Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

microRNA-205 (miR-205) and miR-184 coordinately regulate the lipid phosphatase SHIP2 for Akt survival signaling in keratinocytes. As the PI3K-Akt pathway has also been implicated in regulating the actin cytoskeleton and cell motility, we investigated the role that these 2 miRNAs play in keratinocyte migration. We used antagomirs (antago) to reduce the levels of miR-205 and miR-184 in primary human epidermal keratinocytes (HEKs) and corneal epithelial keratinocytes (HCEKs) as well as direct SHIP2 silencing using siRNA oligos. Treatment of HEKs and HCEKs with antago-205 increased SHIP2 levels and impaired the ability of these cells to seal linear scratch wounds compared with untreated or irrelevant-antago treatments. In contrast, AKT signaling was enhanced and wounds sealed faster in HCEKs where miR-184 was suppressed, enabling miR-205 to inhibit SHIP2. Similar increases in migration were observed following direct SHIP2 silencing in HEKs. Furthermore, down-regulation of miR-205 resulted in an increase in Rho-ROCKI activity, phosphorylation of the actin severing protein cofilin, and a corresponding diminution of filamentous actin. The connection among miR-205, RhoA-ROCKI-cofilin inactivation, and the actin cytoskeleton represents a novel post-translational mechanism for the regulation of normal human keratinocyte migration.-Yu, J., Peng, H., Ruan, Q., Fatima, A., Getsios, S., Lavker, R. M. MicroRNA-205 promotes keratinocyte migration via the lipid phosphatase SHIP2. FASEB J. 24, 3950-3959 (2010). www.fasebj.org

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据