4.7 Article

Depletion of GSH in glial cells induces neurotoxicity: relevance to aging and degenerative neurological diseases

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 2533-2545

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.09-149997

关键词

microglia; astroglia; buthionine-S,R-sulfoximine; neuroinflammation; clotrimazole; TRPM2

资金

  1. Pacific Alzheimer Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative stress induced by inhibition of glutathione (GSH) biosynthesis with D,L-buthionine-S,R-sulfoximine (BSO) causes human microglia, human astrocytes, THP-1 cells, and U373 cells to secrete materials toxic to human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells and stimulates them to release TNF-alpha, IL-6, and nitrite ions. The effect is correlated with activation of the inflammatory pathways P38 MAP-kinase, Jun-N-terminal kinase, and NF-kappa B. The effect is reduced by adding to the medium GSH or clotrimazole (CTM), an inhibitor of Ca2+-influx through TRPM2 channels. It is also produced by inhibiting TRPM2 protein expression in microglia and astrocytes through introduction of its small inhibitory RNA (siRNA). TRPM2 mRNA is expressed by glial cells but not by SH-SY5Y cells. BSO in the culture medium causes an almost 3-fold increase in [Ca2+](i) in microglia and astrocytes over a 24-h period, which is reduced to half by the addition of CTM. The data strongly suggest that inhibiting intracellular GSH synthesis induces a neuroinflammatory response in human microglia and astrocytes, which is linked to Ca2+ influx through TRPM2 channels. It represents a new model for inducing neuroinflammation and suggests that increasing GSH levels in glial cells may confer neuroprotection in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer disease, which have a prominent neuroinflammatory component.-Lee, M., Cho, T., Jantaratnotai, N., Wang, Y.T., McGeer, E., McGeer, P. L. Depletion of GSH in glial cells induces neurotoxicity: relevance to aging and degenerative neurological diseases. FASEB J. 24, 2533-2545 (2010). www.fasebj.org

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据