4.7 Article

Independent evolution of the core domain and its flanking sequences in small heat shock proteins

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 3633-3642

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.10-156992

关键词

alpha-crystallin; protein folding; Hsp20; protein evolution

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB594]
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small heat shock proteins (sHsps) are molecular chaperones involved in maintaining protein homeostasis; they have also been implicated in protein folding diseases and in cancer. In this protein family, a conserved core domain, the so-called alpha-crystallin or Hsp20 domain, is flanked by highly variable, nonconserved sequences that are essential for chaperone function. Analysis of 8714 sHsps revealed a broad variation of primary sequences within the superfamily as well as phyla-dependent differences. Significant variations were found in the number of sHsps per genome, their amino acid composition, and the length distribution of the different sequence parts. Reconstruction of the evolutionary tree for the sHsp superfamily shows that the flanking regions fall into several subgroups, indicating that they were remodeled several times in parallel but independent of the evolution of the alpha-crystallin domain. The evolutionary history of sHsps is thus set apart from that of other protein families in that two exon boundary-independent strategies are combined: the evolution of the conserved alpha-crystallin domain and the independent evolution of the N- and C-terminal sequences. This scenario allows for increased variability in specific small parts of the protein and thus promotes functional and structural differentiation of sHsps, which is not reflected in the general evolutionary tree of species.-Kriehuber, T., Rattei, T., Weinmaier, T., Bepperling, A., Haslbeck, M., Buchner, J. Independent evolution of the core domain and its flanking sequences in small heat shock proteins. FASEB J. 24, 3633-3642 (2010). www.fasebj.org

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据