4.7 Article

Embryonic caffeine exposure induces adverse effects in adulthood

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 1272-1278

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.08-124941

关键词

hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha; cardiac; heart development; echocardiography

资金

  1. U. S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01HL58442, U24 DK-76169]
  2. March of Dimes
  3. Charles H. Hood Foundation
  4. Yale Diabetes Endocrinology Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to determine both the short-term effects on cardiac development and embryo growth and the long-term effects on cardiac function and body composition of in utero caffeine exposure. Pregnant mice (C57BL/6) were exposed to hypoxia (10% O-2) or room air from embryonic days (E) 8.5-10.5, and treated with caffeine (20 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle (normal saline, 0.9% NaCl). This caffeine dose results in a circulating level that is equivalent to 2 cups of coffee in humans. Hypoxic exposure acutely reduced embryonic growth by 30%. Exposure to a single dose of caffeine inhibited cardiac ventricular development by 53% in hypoxia and 37% in room air. Caffeine exposure resulted in inhibition of hypoxia-induced HIF1 alpha protein expression in embryos by 40%. When offspring from dams treated with a single dose of caffeine were studied in adulthood, we observed that caffeine treatment alone resulted in a decrease in cardiac function of 38%, as assessed by echocardiography. We also observed a 20% increase in body fat with male mice exposed to caffeine. Caffeine was dissolved in normal saline, so it was used as a control. Room air controls were used to compare to the hypoxic mice. Exposure to a single dose of caffeine during embryogenesis results in both short-term effects on cardiac development and long-term effects on cardiac function.-Wendler, C. C., Busovsky-McNeal, M., Ghatpande, S., Kalinowski, A., Russell, K. S., Rivkees, S. A. Embryonic caffeine exposure induces adverse effects in adulthood. FASEB J. 23, 1272-1278 (2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据