4.7 Article

The influence of macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene polymorphisms on outcome from community-acquired pneumonia

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 2403-2411

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.09-129445

关键词

cytokines; innate immunity; sepsis; TNF

资金

  1. NIH [NIGMS R01 GM61992, NIAID R01 AI042310, NO1 AI50031]
  2. GlaxoSmithKline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cytokine, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), is encoded in a functionally polymorphic locus and subjects with high-expression MIF alleles are at an increased risk of inflammatory disease. Severe sepsis is the leading cause of death in intensive care units, and the prevailing hypothesis is that an excessive innate response contributes to its pathogenesis. To assess if MIF alleles influence the clinical course of infection, we conducted a case-control study to assess susceptibility and a parallel inception cohort study of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) to assess risk of severe sepsis and 90-d mortality. Two distinct polymorphisms in the MIF promoter were analyzed: a G/C transition at -173 and a CATT repeat at -794. The frequency of both polymorphisms was similar in the CAP cohort (n = 1739) and controls (n = 639); however, the 90-d mortality was lower for the high-expression C allele (P=0.003). This association remained significant after adjusting for demographics, comorbid conditions, and disease severity score [hazard ratio=0.64 (0.44-0.91), P=0.01]. The hazard ratio was similar in different geographic subcohorts, and the association remained significant after adjusting for false discovery. These data indicate that polymorphisms associated with higher MIF expression may have a beneficial effect in community-acquired pneumonia.-Yende, S., Angus, D. C., Kong, L., Kellum, J. A., Weissfeld, L., Ferrell, R., Finegold, D., Carter, M., Leng, L., Peng, Z.-Y., Bucala, R. The influence of macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene polymorphisms on outcome from community-acquired pneumonia. FASEB J. 23, 2403-2411 (2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据