4.7 Article

Caveolin-1 regulates the secretion and cytoprotection of Cyr61 in hyperoxic cell death

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 341-350

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.08-108423

关键词

CNN; exocytosis; signaling

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K08 HL085601] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cysteine-rich 61 (Cyr61) belongs to the CCN family and mediates cell proliferation, survival, and apoptosis. Our previous studies showed that Cyr61 protected against hyperoxia-induced lung cell death via Akt phosphorylation. Caveolin-1 (cav-1), a 22-kDa trans-membrane scaffolding protein, is the principal structural component of caveolae. Emerging data show that cav-1 regulates signal transduction-associated proteins that reside in the caveolae. Numerous integrin-related pathways, including PI3K/Akt-induced cell survival are controlled by cav-1-mediated signaling. Our data showed that recombinant Cyr61 promoted cell proliferation and resistance to hyperoxia-induced cell death in vitro. Neutralizing antibodies reversed the above effects, indicating functional role of secreted Cyr61 in response to hyperoxic stress. While deletion of cav-1 protected cells from hyperoxia-induced cell death, Cyr61-neutralizing antibodies abolished this protective effect. Furthermore, Cyr61 and cav-1 colocalized and physically interacted via integrins in bronchial epithelial cells. Deletion of cav-1 increased extracellular and decreased cytosolic Cyr61, both in vitro and in vivo. Pretreatment with Brefeldin A increased intracellular Cyr61 in cav-1(-/-) cells, while decreasing extracellular Cyr61. Taken together, Cav-1/Cyr61 interaction via integrins represents a novel pathway of Cyr61 signaling involving cav-1-dependent processes, which play a critical role in regulating hyperoxia-induced cell death. - Jin, Y., Kim, H. P., Cao, J., Zhang, M., Ifedigbo, E., Choi, A. M. K. Caveolin-1 regulates the secretion and cytoprotection of Cyr61 in hyperoxic cell death. FASEB J. 23, 341-350 (2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据