4.7 Article

Directed induction of anterior and posterior primitive streak by Wnt from embryonic stem cells cultured in a chemically defined serum-free medium

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 114-122

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.08-111203

关键词

mesendoderm; endoderm; regenerative medicine; brachyury; sox17

资金

  1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company, Inc
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  3. Naito Foundation,
  4. Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Formation of the primitive streak (PS) is the initial specification step that generates all the mesodermal and endodermal tissue lineages during early differentiation. Thus, a therapeutically compatible and efficient method for differentiation of the PS is crucial for regenerative medicine. In this study, we developed chemically defined serum-free culture conditions for the differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells into the PS-like cells. Cultures supplemented with Wnt showed induction of expression of a PS marker, the brachyury gene, followed by induction of the anterior PS markers goosecoid and foxa2, a posterior PS marker, evx1, and the endoderm marker sox17. Similar differentiation of PS by Wnt was also observed in human ES cells. Moreover, we revealed that the activation of the Wnt canonical pathway is essential for PS differentiation in mouse ES cells. These results demonstrated that Wnt is an essential and sufficient factor for the induction of the PS-like cells in vitro. These conditions of induction could constitute the initial step in generating therapeutically useful cells of the definitive endoderm lineage, such as hepatocytes and pancreatic endocrine cells, under chemically defined conditions. Nakanishi, M., Kurisaki, A., Hayashi, Y., Warashina, M., Ishiura, S., Kusuda-Furue, M., Asashima, M. Directed induction of anterior and posterior primitive streak by Wnt from embryonic stem cells cultured in a chemically defined serum-free medium. FASEB J. 23, 114-122 (2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据