4.7 Article

Adaptive peripheral immune response increases proliferation of neural precursor cells in the adult hippocampus

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 3121-3128

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.08-113944

关键词

CD4; glucocorticoids; rheumatoid arthritis

资金

  1. VolkswagenStiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To understand the link between peripheral immune activation and neuronal precursor biology, we investigated the effect of T-cell activation on adult hippocampal neurogenesis in female C57B1/6 mice. A peripheral adaptive immune response triggered by adjuvant-induced rheumatoid arthritis (2 mu g/mu l methylated BSA) or staphylococcus enterotoxin B (EC50 of 0.25 mu g/ml per 20 g body weight) was associated with a transient increase in hippocampal precursor cell proliferation and neurogenesis as assessed by immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. Both treatments were paralleled by an increase in corticosterone levels in the hippocampus 1- to 2-fold over the physiological amount measured by quantitative radioimmunoassay. In contrast, intraperitoneal administration of the innate immune response activator lipopolysaccaride (EC50 of 0.5 mu g/ml per 20 g body weight) led to a chronic 5-fold increase of hippocampal glucocorticoid levels and a decrease of adult neurogenesis. In vitro exposure of murine neuronal progenitor cells to corticosterone triggered either cell death at high (1.5 nM) or proliferation at low ( 0.25 nM) concentrations. This effect could be blocked using a viral vector system expressing a transdomain of the glucocorticoid receptor. We suggest an evolutionary relevant communication route for the brain to respond to environmental stressors like inflammation mediated by glucocorticoid levels in the hippocampus.-Wolf, S. A., Steiner, B., Wengner, A., Lipp, M., Kammertoens, T., Kempermann, G. Adaptive peripheral immune response increases proliferation of neural precursor cells in the adult hippocampus. FASEB J. 23, 3121-3128 (2009). www.fasebj.org

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据