4.2 Article

Small-molecule diagnostics based on functional DNA nanotechnology: a dipstick test for mercury

期刊

FARADAY DISCUSSIONS
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 125-135

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c005404f

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institute of Health [ES16865]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-08ER64568]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-0117792, CTS-0120978, DMI-0328162]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R01ES016865] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detecting small molecular targets such as metal ions is just as important as detecting large molecules such as DNA, RNA and proteins, but the field of metal ion sensors has not yet been well developed. A good example of a metal ion target is mercury, which is highly toxic, widely distributed in the environment and affects human health. To develop a diagnostic platform for metal ions, we demonstrate that functional DNA-linked gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) can quickly and simply detect and quantify Hg2+ ions in aqueous solution, with high sensitivity and selectivity over competing metal ions. A linker DNA molecule containing thymine residues and sequences complementary to the DNA on the AuNPs was designed to aggregate DNA-functionalized AuNPs. When Hg2+ ions were introduced into this system, they induced the linker DNA to fold by forming thymine-Hg2+-thymine bonds. The linker DNA's folding caused the AuNPs to rapidly disassemble, which caused a discernable color change in the solution from purple to red. The limit of detection for Hg2+ in the present method is 5.4 nM, which is below the 10 nM maximum contaminant level defined by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for drinking water. Our results show that this Hg2+ detection method has excellent selectivity over other divalent metal ions (e. g. Pb2+, Cu2+, Mn2+, Co2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Ba2+). This system has been converted into a dipstick test using lateral-flow devices, making it even more practical for point-of-care diagnostics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据