4.2 Article

Mutual referral: a survey of GPs in Beijing

期刊

FAMILY PRACTICE
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 441-447

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmr122

关键词

Beijing; clinical guidelines; primary care physicians; referrals; specialists

资金

  1. Chinese Government [2007BAI24B07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China has been engaged in the process of reforming its health care system recently. The government has attempted to rebuild the referral system to lower cost and enhance equity of the medical services. This study was undertaken to evaluate the current status of mutual referral pilot programme, perceived factors that affect referral behaviour and changes that would improve the current referral process in Beijing. Using a cross-sectional study design, we sent a postal questionnaire to 138 urban district community health service (CHS) centres in Beijing. Questions were chosen from a formal consensus process based on a nominal group technique. One hundred twenty-five of 138 (90.6%) CHS centres responded to the survey. Seventy-six (61.8%) CHS centres reported that the mutual referral system was feasible. Twenty-six (21.1%) CHS centres reported that the mutual referral programme was running smoothly. Uncertainties of diagnosis/management and access to particular medical specialty interest or skills were the two most common factors that were suggested as affecting referral behaviour. The presence of a dedicated department to accept referrals in hospitals and the use of referral guidelines were the most preferred choices as likely to improve the current referral process. Since a system of gatekeeper role by GPs at CHS organizations has not been established in Beijing, most CHS doctors agree that to ensure the smooth operation of referrals, a dedicated department should be assigned by hospitals to receive referred patients. Official guidelines on referral should be developed, and health authorities should strengthen their supervision of referrals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据