4.2 Article

Nephron sparing surgery in von Hippel-Lindau associated renal cell carcinoma; clinicopathological long-term follow-up

期刊

FAMILIAL CANCER
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 387-394

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9525-7

关键词

von Hippel-Lindau disease; Renal cell carcinoma; Nephron sparing surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated the clinicopathological outcome of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)-patients who had mainly undergone nephron sparing surgery (NSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) when the tumour diameter has reached 4.0 cm. Multiple, bilateral RCC with high recurrence rates and subsequent repeated interventions, followed by increasing risk for end-stage renal failure and metastases is characteristic for VHL. NSS is widely used for VHL-associated RCC at 3.0 cm cut-off. 54 VHL patients underwent NSS, nephrectomy or thermal ablation for RCC. We analysed time to second treatment, overall and cancer specific survival, intra- and post-operative data as well as tumour characteristics. We also examined the effects of delaying removal of RCC to 4.0 cm cut-off. Median follow-up was 67 months. 54 patients underwent 97 kidney treatments. 96 % of first and 67 % of second interventions comprised of NSS. 0 % metastases were observed in the group with largest tumour size a parts per thousand currency sign4 cm. The probability for second surgery was 21 %, at 5 years and 42 % at 10 years. Median time to second NSS was 149.6 months. The overall and cancer specific survival rate was 96.5 and 100 % at 5-year follow-up, and 82.5 and 90.5 % respectively at 10-year follow-up. Median delay to second NSS at 4.0 cm cut-off versus 3.0 cm was 27.8 months. NSS was both successfully used in first and second surgery and to some extent even in third surgery. By following a strict surveillance protocol it is possible to support a 4.0 cm-threshold strategy for NSS, based on the assumption that delaying time to second NSS prevents patients from premature renal failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据